Accountability. Compliance. Transparency.
Founded as MAOS, 2008
Systems fail methodically.
So do officials.
Power concedes nothing.
Pressure makes it.
There are those who heed the warning "don't mess with Texas," and then there are those who do the exact opposite.
Stevens is in the second group.
The Art of Tactical Textualism.
My Acts of Sedition (once MAOS, now ACTS) is where this work began. It started as a watchdog project focused on local government corruption in South Florida.
The rules were followed exactly.
The results were made public.
Systems moved.
Elected officials went to jail.
Everything that came later traces back here.
About ACTS
ACTS is a public archive of real-world governance stress tests and failure analysis; it is intentionally confrontational. That’s the point.
Stress testing doesn’t work if everyone plays nice. Systems only reveal themselves under pressure. They bend. Or they break. There is no third option.
ACTS applies real-world pressure the way journalists, litigants, and hostile-but-lawful actors actually do. Not hypotheticals. Not workshops. Live fire.
What you’re reading is documentation. Failure modes. Escalation paths. Weak seams in laws, policies, and administrative instinct. This is not legal advice. Not advocacy. Not consulting.
It’s an archive of what happens when governance meets resistance, honed thru decades of in-the-wild experience.
Private, downstream work exists for organizations that want to understand these risks before they turn into lawsuits, headlines, or findings. That work is clinical. This page is not.
ACTS does not go gently. It load-tests.
Stop Guessing. Start Forcing Records Out.
You don’t win public-records fights by asking nicely.
You win by knowing exactly how agencies evade, delay, and sanitize—and how to box them in legally.
The FOI Playbook is the field manual I actually use: request structure, follow-ups, traps, timelines, and pressure tactics that force disclosures or build a clean record of noncompliance.
Need the system to move?
Recent Musings
ACTS, Unfiltered
Equal access. Malicious compliance. Constitutional pressure.
This is the archive of what happens when laws are forced to work as written.
ACTS isn’t a brand. It’s a record.
Each item below documents a tactic, a pressure point, or a system failure that couldn’t survive equal application.
You’re not buying merch.
You’re funding the work—and preserving the evidence.
Exposing Hypocrisy
One Story At A Time.
Media Hits
Let me teach you how to get in the news.
Press Hits
We'll Make You A Master Of The Media.

I Asked for an ESA Letter After a 10-Minute Chat. He Said Yes.
By Chaz Stevens Founder, REVOLT Training System Failure Boot Camp™ Want a letter for four emotional…

Investigating ESA Letter Abuse in California
This content is shared for public education, journalistic investigation, and policy advocacy. It includes direct communications…

California’s ESA Letter Scam: 15 Minutes, $149, No Care
This piece is a work of investigative commentary. All opinions expressed are those of the author…

How One Man (and One Bible Ban) Made DeSantis Blink
How Chaz Stevens Weaponizes Communication to Burn Systems Down (and Make DeSantis Blink) Forget influencer fluff.…

Burn the Letter Mill Down: How One $99 ESA Letter Could Crater an Industry.
Ever buy a disability accommodation letter in under 2 minutes? I did. That’s how this story…

I’m calling Austin’s bluff on the Ten Commandments | The Dallas Morning News
by Chaz Stevens Dallas Morning News Soon, Gov. Greg Abbott will sign Senate Bill 10 into…
Being ACTS
Tactical Textualism is a civic activism methodology developed by Chaz Stevens that enforces government accountability by applying the literal text of laws—such as the First Amendment or Public Records Acts—to force institutions into binary choices: total compliance or the elimination of discriminatory policies.
REVOLT Training uses ‘malicious compliance’ to stress-test government systems. By insisting that administrative rules be applied exactly as written, the process exposes selective enforcement and forces agencies to either formalize their governance or abandon unconstitutional practices.
By following the literal text of Florida’s 2022 book-ban law to challenge the Bible in 63 school districts, Stevens forced a state-wide legislative revision. The action proved that selective enforcement of ‘neutral’ rules cannot withstand equal application of the law.
This project uses the First Amendment’s viewpoint neutrality requirement to challenge legislative prayer. By requesting to deliver a Satanic invocation, Stevens forces cities to either allow all viewpoints or replace religious prayer with a secular moment of silence.
A $1 claim acts as a ‘jurisdictional anchor’ in federal court. It prevents government defendants from mooting a constitutional case by changing behavior mid-litigation, ensuring a court must rule on the underlying legal violation.
No. Chaz Stevens operates through the Church of Satanology, a distinct entity used as a legal symbol to stress-test religious neutrality. He is not affiliated with The Satanic Temple.
Following Stevens’ 2008 investigations, the Mayor of Deerfield Beach and a City Commissioner were arrested on corruption charges. In 2011, another commissioner was convicted of falsifying business records.
The FOI Playbook is a method for request engineering that uses precise legal framing and documentation traps to make it legally impossible for agencies to ignore public records requests.
These challenges rely on the Public Forum Doctrine. If a government allows one religious display, it cannot legally discriminate against other viewpoints, including satirical or secular ones like a Festivus Pole.
Under recent precedents like Lindke v. Freed, a politician’s social media account becomes ‘state action’ if used for official duties. Blocking critics in this context may constitute unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.





